Modular Neutron Array: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:07, 7 July 2008

Revision as of 08:59, 11 July 2008

Line 1:

{{uncategorizedtechnical|date=JuneJuly 2008}}

== The MoNA Detector Array==

[[Image:mona_above.jpg|thumb|200px|right|The MoNA Array]]

The '''Modular Neutron Array (MoNA)''' is a large-area, high efficiency [[neutron detector]] designed for detecting [[neutrons]] stemming from breakup reactions of fast fragmentation beams. It is located at [http://www.msu.edu [Michigan State University]]'s] [http://www.nscl.msu.edu [National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory]] and(NSCL). has

== aThe [http://www.cord.edu/dept/physics/mona/overview_collaboration.htmlMoNA homepage].Detector Array==
In its original configuration, MoNA consisted of 9 vertical layers of 16 detectors each stacked in compact form, having an active area of 2.0 m wide by 1.6 m tall. In its current arrangement (depicted in the image to the right), it is stacked in four separate sections of 2, 2, 2, and 3 layers each, respectively, separated by spaces ranging from 0.5 to 0.8 meters. It measures both the position and time of neutron events with multiple-hit capability. The energy of a neutron is based on a time-of-flight measurement. This information together with the detected position of the neutron is used to construct the momentum vector of the neutrons.<ref>B. Luther et al., Nucl. Instr. And Methods A505, 33 (2003)</ref><ref>T. Baumann et al., Nucl. Instr. And Methods A543, 517 (2005)</ref><br /><br />

The detection efficiency of MoNA is maximized for the high-beam velocities that are available at the [http://www.nscl.msu.edu NSCL's] Coupled Cyclotron Facility (CCF). For neutrons ranging from 50 to 250 [[MeV]] in energy, it is designed to have an efficiency of up to 70% and expands the possible coincidence experiments with neutrons to measurements which were previously not feasible. The detector is used in combination with the Sweeper magnet<ref>V. Zelevinsky and A. Volya, AIP Conf. Proc. 819, 493 (2006)</ref><ref>S. Prestemon et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11, 1721 (2001)</ref><ref>J. Toth et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 12, 341 (2002)</ref><ref>M. B. Bird et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 14, 564 (2004)</ref><ref>M. B. Bird et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15, 1252 (2005)</ref> and its focal plane detectors for charged particles.<ref>N. Frank, Ph.D. Thesis, MSU (2006)</ref> In addition, MoNA’s modular design allows it to be transported between experimental vaults and thus to be used in combination with the Sweeper magnet installed at the S800 magnet spectrograph.<ref>D. Bazin et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 204, 629 (2003)</ref> Due to its high-energy detection efficiency, this detector will be well suited for experiments with fast fragmentation beams at the proposed ISF.

== History ==

When the NSCL upgraded their capabilities to the Coupled Cyclotron Facilityfacility, ana FSU[[Florida State University]]/MSUMichigan State University consortium built the Sweeper magnet to be used with two existing neutron walls to perform neutron–fragment coincidence experiments. The neutron walls were originally built for lower beam energies and had only an efficiency of about 12% for the neutron energies expected from the CCF. During the 2000 NSCL users meeting, a working group realized the opportunity to significantly enhance the efficiency with an array of more layers using plastic [[scintillator|scintillator detectors]].<br /><br />

Several NSCL users from undergraduate schools were present at the working group meeting and they suggested that the modular nature and simple construction would offer great opportunities to involve undergraduate students.<br /><br />

Several NSCL users from undergraduate schools were present at the working group meeting and they suggested that the modular nature and simple construction would offer great opportunities to involve undergraduate students.

In the spring of 2001, the idea evolved into several MRI proposals submitted by 10 different institutions, most of them undergraduate schools. The proposals were funded by the NSF in the summer of 2001. Following the detailed design, the first modules of the detector array were delivered in the summer of 2002. During the following year all modules were assembled and tested by undergraduate students at their school,<ref>R. H. Howes et al., American Journal of Physics 73, 122 (2005)</ref> and finally added to form the complete array at the NSCL.<br /><br />

The MoNA collaboration continued after the initial phase of construction and commissioning was concluded [MoNA], and is now using the detector array for experiments, giving a large number of undergraduate students from all collaborating schools the opportunity to take part in cutting-edge nuclear physics experiments at one of the world’s leading rare-isotope facilities. The research at the undergraduate institutions is funded by the NSF through several RUI grants (Research at Undergraduate Institutions) grants.

== The MoNA Collaboration ==

The MoNA project is a collaboration between ten colleges and universities that originally constructed the highly efficient large-area neutron detector for the detection of high-energy neutrons to be used in experiments with fast rare isotopes at the [http://www.nscl.msu.edu National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory]NSCL. The project is funded by the [http://www.nsf.gov [National Science Foundation]].<br /><br />

The members of the collaboration are<br />

<blockquote>

[http://www.cmich.edu Central Michigan University]<br />

[http://www.cord.edu Concordia College at Moorhead]<br />

[http://www.fsu.edu Florida State University]<br />

[http://www.hope.edu Hope College]<br />

[http://www.iusb.edu Indiana University South Bend]<br />

[http://www.marquette.edu Marquette University]<br />

[http://www.msu.edu Michigan State University]<br />

[http://www.wabash.edu Wabash College]<br />

[http://www.wmich.edu Western Michigan University]<br />

[http://www.westmont.edu Westmont College]<br />

</blockquote>

The Collaboration is committed to involving undergraduates in significant parts of the experimental program at the MoNA facility. Most of the Collaboration member institutions are primarily undergraduate schools. Undergraduates helped construct and test MoNA. They continue to participate in experiments during runs and through data analysis.

The members of the collaboration are<br />:

== The Role of Undergraduate students ==

*[[http://www.cmich.edu Central Michigan University]<br />]

The physical characteristics and performance of MoNA were not the only things carefully considered by the collaboration. From the outset, several goals for the education of undergraduate students were identified: How can these students be continually and effectively involved in forefront research? What are the benefits to the students from this participation? What are the benefits to institutions and faculty members? When students participate in the experiments and when they work with the data sets, how can they evolve from passive watchers to active doers with the responsibility to get answers?

*[http://www.cord.edu[Concordia College (Minnesota)|Concordia College at Moorhead]<br />]

The collaboration has addressed this challenge by creating intensive summer sessions designed for undergraduates, encouraging students to participate in all phases of experiments, holding several meetings a year that include undergraduate participants, and employing information technology to bring the distant undergraduate students together.<br />

*[[http://www.fsu.edu Florida State University]<br />]

Many voices have recognized the need for a strong basic science program in the United States. Most recently the National Academy of Sciences published the “Rising Above the Gathering Storm” study that outlines consequences and needed actions. The coming decade will need a steady stream of people (new physicists) as well as strong financial support. As in the past many of these people will come from undergraduate institutions and the most prepared will be those involved in meaningful undergraduate research such as done by the MoNA collaboration at the NSCL involving fragmentation. While planning future installations for nuclear physics, the value of this educational approach and training must be recognized. Undergraduates must be involved in an affirming environment where they are engaged at a high intellectual level and truly challenged so they are ready for the work yet to be done. Our fragmentation studies at the NSCL have demonstrated how to do this effectively. The weekly video conferences are very helpful for including the undergraduates.

*[[Hope College]]

*[[http://www.iusb.edu Indiana University South Bend]<br />]

*[[Marquette University]]

*[[http://www.msu.edu Michigan State University]<br />]

*[[Wabash College]]

*[[http://www.wmich.edu Western Michigan University]<br />]

*[[Westmont College]]

The Collaborationcollaboration is committed to involving undergraduates in significant parts of the experimental program at the MoNA facility. Most of the Collaborationcollaboration member institutions are primarily undergraduate schools. Undergraduates helped construct and test MoNA. Theyand continue to participate in experiments during runs and through data analysis. It also created intensive summer sessions designed for undergraduates, encouraging students to participate in all phases of experiments, holding several meetings a year that include undergraduate participants, and employing information technology to bring the distant undergraduate students together.

== References ==

{{reflist}}

{{uncategorized|date=June 2008}}

==External links==

*[http://www.cord.edu/dept/physics/mona/overview_collaboration.html MoNA homepage]

[[Category:Michigan State University]]

[[Category:Particle experiments]]

[[Category:Science and technology in the United States]]