Content deleted Content added
→Contraction mappings: Bear in mind WP:V#Burden of evidence |
|||
Line 122:
::I have to point out that's by you yourself (a point you might have made) -- I think the onus is on you to show that it is appropriate in the light of [[WP:V#SELF]] or, preferably, find another, third-party, reference. [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] ([[User talk:Richard Pinch|talk]]) 21:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
:::The same material has been published in regular scientific channels, eg Applications of Evolutionary Computing, 2005, LNCS 3449 http://www.springer.com/computer/foundations/book/978-3-540-25396-9 and ACM Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering; The Electric Sheep and their Dreams in High Fidelity; Scott Draves (invited keynote) June 2006 http://www.siggraph.org/events/symposia/npar2006 But the Flame paper linked here is more accessible and complete. And if you google for "contractive on average" you will see others using this phrase for IFS. The reference was already in the bibliography I am just letting you know what page specifically... [[User:Spot|Spot]] ([[User talk:Spot|talk]]) 22:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
::::References published in regular scientific channels would be the appropriate ones to add. If you have one which defines "contractive on average" then by all means add that too. Bear in mind that [[WP:V#Burden of evidence]] puts the onus on you to do that when you add material. [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] ([[User talk:Richard Pinch|talk]]) 22:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
| |||