Revision as of 19:10, 8 August 2008 edit Wanderer57 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 4,886 edits →Dumb Questions: further question ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:14, 8 August 2008 edit undo Trovatore (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 39,114 edits →Dumb Questions: yes Next edit →
Line 101: ::I didn't mean to suggest including tons of examples but I think a few examples would help a lot. Thanks. [[User:Wanderer57\|Wanderer57]] ([[User talk:Wanderer57\|talk]]) 19:10, 8 August 2008 (UTC) :::The answer to your question is "yes" (well, except I'd quibble on "positive", since we seem to be allowing 0), and your program witnesses that the set of all natural numbers is r.e. --[[User:Trovatore\|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore\|talk]]) 19:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Computably enumerable set: Difference between revisions