Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Open Content - A Practical Guide to Using Creative Commons Licences/The basics of Open Content licencing/cs: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Created page with "Např. "Open Database Attribution" a "ShareAlike for Data/Databases-licence", které vydává Open Knowledge, viz: http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/."
Created page with "Pro svobodný a otevřený software existují dvě definice. Viz definice Nadace pro svobodný software (FSF): $link1 a definice Open Source Iniciativy pro otevřený software (OSI): $link2. Obě definice jsou z velké části totožné."
Line 183:
<ref name=c>Např. "Open Database Attribution" a "ShareAlike for Data/Databases-licence", které vydává Open Knowledge, viz: http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/.</ref>
 
<ref name=d>ForPro Freesvobodný anda Open Source Softwareotevřený theresoftware areexistují twodvě definitionsdefinice. SeeViz thedefinice definitionNadace ofpro thesvobodný Free Software Foundationsoftware (FSF): https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html anda thedefinice Open Source DefinitionIniciativy ofpro the Open Sourceotevřený Initiativesoftware (OSI): http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php. BothObě definitionsdefinice arejsou byz andvelké largečásti identicaltotožné.</ref>
 
<ref name=e>There are a variety of diverging definitions for Open Content (see e.g. http://opendefinition.org/od/), Free Content or Free Cultural Works (see: http://freedomdefined.org/Definition). Unlike the Free and Open Source Software definitions which may be regarded as de facto standard, none of the Open Content definitions seem universally accepted though.</ref>
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Open_Content_-_A_Practical_Guide_to_Using_Creative_Commons_Licences/The_basics_of_Open_Content_licencing/cs"