Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MidiNotate Composer: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
vote change to keep |
Randywombat (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 15:
*'''Rewrite complete''' I've rewritten the article, and would like some constructive feedback. Please let me know what you think, or if you see room for improvement. I've condensed two articles into this one, with the thought of deleting the other one, following the example in the [[Finale notation program]] as suggested above. Thanks. [[User:Sherryc|Sherryc]] 23:12, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
*Changing vote to '''keep''' based on rewrite. It's a little rah-rah, with more detail than I honestly think the subject deserves in Wikipedia, but it reads largely like an encyclopedia entry now, I suppose. [[User:Bunchofgrapes|Bunchofgrapes]] 00:39, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' based on rewrite. Thanks for doing this, [[User:Sherryc|Sherryc]]. It still needs some more evaluation of pros and cons (perhaps third-party) and perhaps a comparison with other programs, showing the differences between it and its competitors. And I agree with [[User:Bunchofgrapes|Bunchofgrapes]]: the article is disproportionately long and detailed, but that's not a reason to delete it. [[User:Randywombat|Wombat]] 10:35, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
| |||