Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MidiNotate Composer: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 16:
*Changing vote to '''keep''' based on rewrite. It's a little rah-rah, with more detail than I honestly think the subject deserves in Wikipedia, but it reads largely like an encyclopedia entry now, I suppose. [[User:Bunchofgrapes|Bunchofgrapes]] 00:39, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' based on rewrite. Thanks for doing this, [[User:Sherryc|Sherryc]]. It still needs some more evaluation of pros and cons (perhaps third-party) and perhaps a comparison with other programs, showing the differences between it and its competitors. And I agree with [[User:Bunchofgrapes|Bunchofgrapes]]: the article is disproportionately long and detailed, but that's not a reason to delete it. [[User:Randywombat|Wombat]] 10:35, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Thanks for the tips, and the votes of confidence! I thought about including some comparisons with other programs, but I was afraid that someone might think I was trying to write a "product comparison review" as advertising or something :) So, I went more with the "what this particular program has" approach (hence the listing of capabilities) so that people would know about these particular programs. Which approach might be better? I don't want to make it a "this versus that" type of article - I've seen some of the discussions on some of the other software articles, and I'm not trying to make a "this is definitively better than that" article. I'm just trying to inform folks about a program that I've found useful, and that others might want to know about since there is a "music software" category in Wikipedia. Thoughts? Suggestions? Thanks! [[User:Sherryc|Sherryc]] 16:43, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
| |||