Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
deactivating cat |
||
Line 31:
But supporters defend MN saying it is "effective, powerful"[http://www.freeinquiry.com/naturalism.html] "promoting successful investigation"[http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/nontheism/naturalism/index.html] and "an essential aspect of ... the study of the natural universe"[http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/MethodologicalNaturalism.htm] They also view the history of science as showing "a progression from supernaturalism to naturalism"[http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mark_vuletic/ntse.html] Supporters consider the alternative, [[methodological supernaturalism]], as "positively ineffective and counter-productive, ... in attempts to understand the natural world"[http://www.freeinquiry.com/naturalism.html]
[[:Category:Philosophy of science]]
==External links==
| |||