Talk:Procedural programming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:17, 17 August 2008

Revision as of 01:21, 17 August 2008

Line 131:

:: The list is suppose to give the reader some popular examples of programs written using procedural programming. Most of the software listed is available as open source. This way the reader can see some examples of programs written using the procedural programming style. Yes, this whole list is an advertisement for procedural programming! Yes, the reader can actually see some GOOD examples of procedural programs that have actually worked in the real world -despite some false reasonings by some in the OOP community that procedural programming leads to unproductive spaghetti code. --[[Special:Contributions/76.25.205.169|76.25.205.169]] ([[User talk:76.25.205.169|talk]]) 21:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

: I have a note on this too. What is Spore doing in that list? If it's programmed using a procedural language, there should at least be a reference. Though my guess is that it's not, because very few big game productions are made with procedural languages these days, and why would a team, who have never made games in anything but OO languages, suddenly change it? AndBesides, handling all that user created content would be a lot easier in an OO lanugage, than in a procedural one. My guess is that someone has misunderstood the term Procedural Generation (game content being generated procedurally by the players), for being programmed with a procedural language. I may be wrong though? [[User:Or-whatever|Or-whatever]] ([[User talk:Or-whatever|talk]]) 01:15, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

== Comparison with object-oriented programming ==