Content deleted Content added
Reflective? |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
Out of curiosity for the language I just read this entry, and I got to say, though the author(s) clearly have been trying to be objective it /is/ a quite biased account. The neutrality of the article feels very superficial, and the tone of the contents is clearly of a ardent advocate. I had no preconceptions of the language but after reading the article I find myself slightly put off simply from the subtextual bias. -- Mikademus
----------
This all reads a bit like advertising copy for the ISE commercial product. Is there someone out there who actually knows Eiffel, but also knows something else and can give a more realistic appraisal. (Yes, it does look like a nice language, but there are other nice languages, and this stuff is just over the top.)
-- Geronimo Jones.
| |||