Comparison of multi-paradigm programming languages: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:11, 18 September 2005

Revision as of 11:23, 18 September 2005

Line 6:

Languages can be grouped by the number and types of paradigms supported.

'''===Two paradigms'''===

*[[Functional programming|functional]], [[Imperative programming|imperative]]

**[[APL programming language|APL]]

Line 16:

**[[Perl]]

**[[PHP]]

'''===Three paradigms'''===

* functional, imperative, object-oriented

**[[BETA]]

Line 27 ⟶ 28:

**[[C Plus Plus|C++]]

**[[D programming language|D]]

'''===Four paradigms'''===

*functional, imperative, [[Logic programming|logic-based]], object-oriented

**[[Leda programming language|Leda]]

*functional, imperative, object-oriented, prototype-based

**[[Lua programming language|Lua]]

*[[Concurrent programming language|concurrent]], generic (template metaprogramming), imperative, object-oriented

'''Seven===Five paradigms'''===

*[[Concurrent programming language|concurrent]], [[Distributed programming|distributed]], generic (template metaprogramming), imperative, object-oriented

**[[Ada programming language|Ada]]

'''Seven paradigms'''

===Seven paradigms===

*concurrent, [[Constraint programming|constraint]], [[Distributed programming|distributed]], functional (evaluation: [[eager evaluation|eager]], [[lazy evaluation|lazy]]), imperative, [[logic programming|logic]], object-oriented

**[[Oz programming language|Oz]]

***[[Mozart Programming System]] a [[multiplatform]] Oz