Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electric Universe concept: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Keep |
Iantresman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5:
*'''Delete''' Many of the references appear to be wrongly appropriated. Others are unscientific. So the question seems to me to be whether this is a notable social phenomenon (as it's not a scientific theory). I don't think it is but I'm open to being convinced otherwise. [[User:Dlyons493|Dlyons493]] 19:30, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep:''' I agree with Solarusdude. In my opinion, the whole Electric Universe thing is crackpot psuedoscience that's been picked up by the oddball fringe, but it does have a significant group of followers (for whatever reason) who are good at making noise. As long as the article clearly states that this is not mainstream science and is widely dismissed and riduculed as lacking merit by most every mainstream physicist, I'm fine with it being here. I do think, however, that the article has gotten badly out of control, and that someone needs to wrestle it back into having some semblance of objectivity. — [[User:Maylett|Cory Maylett]]
'''Keep''': As the main author of this article, I should mention that it has '''already''' gone through the Votes for deletion process, where originality was discussed. See previous [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Electric_Universe_model Votes for deletion]. The article survived the vote.
| |||