Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2008/September: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 2:
===NEW DISCOVERIES===
<!-- Please add new discoveries immediately below here, with header level === -->
==={{tl|AFL-bio-1850s-stub}}===
Upmerged, and in line with other similar by-decade types, so seems keepable on that basis. Doubt this will ever need splitting out, though, given that the earliest organisation of the AFL was only in the late 1850s - there can't be that many stubs on Aussie Rules players from that era. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:15, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
==={{tl|Liliales-stub}} / {{cl|Liliales stubs}}===
New unproposed stub type for an order of monocot plants, complete with its own category (don't you love it when unproposed categories spring up with the WP:WSS notice saying not to create stub types without proposal already in them? Sort of adding insult to injury, or - in this case - perhaps gilding the lily is a better term). Problem with this one is that {{cl|Monocot stubs}} has fewer than 210 unsubcatted stubs, so it's not within a bull's roar of needing a further new split. It also greatly reduces the chances that this type - currently with 25 stubs - will get close to threshold. The template may well be useful in the long run, but it should very likely be upmerged for now. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 11:39, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
| |||