Revision as of 15:10, 12 September 2008 edit 98.217.8.46 (talk) →Light cone ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:12, 12 September 2008 edit undo 98.217.8.46 (talk) →Light cone Next edit →
Line 421: Been in numerous articles with no negative comments. Resolved - thanks MissMJ. [[User:Dhatfield\|Dhatfield]] ([[User talk:Dhatfield\|talk]]) 22:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC) :No offense guys, I think the original one was better. The gradients look amateurish on the new one (they aren't correct for the forms), the stars don't mean anything, and the original one had a nice simplicity to it. The original one looks like it could be in a science textbook. The new one looks like it is something someone made for Wikipedia. Just my two cents. When I am looking for a light cone image to use, I'm going to use the first one, not the second one. Specifying "years" for time is totally inaccurate. In fact the whole thing has gotten more inaccurate. The light cone is not just meant for interstellar distances—it's a fundamental concept to all of special relativity, and applies even on small scales. Ugly and inaccurate -- bad combination! --[[Special:Contributions/98.217.8.46\|98.217.8.46]] ([[User talk:98.217.8.46\|talk]]) 15:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC) == Image:APISmap1.pdf ==

Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Images to improve/Archive/Jul 2008: Difference between revisions