Carmichael's totient function conjecture: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m copyedit recent additions
Line 7:
Carmichael proved that any counterexample to his conjecture (that is, a value ''n'' such that &phi;(''n'') is different from the totients of all other numbers) must be at least 10<sup>37</sup>, and [[Victor Klee]] extended this result to 10<sup>400</sup>. Carmichael's conjecture has since been verified computationally for all ''n'' less than or equal to 10<sup>10<sup>7</sup></sup> by Schlafly and Wagon. The current lower bound for a counterexample to the Conjecture is 10<sup>10<sup>10</sup></sup>, which was determined by Kevin Ford in 1998.
 
Although the conjecture is widely believed, Carl Pomerance gave a sufficient condition for an integer ''n'' that canto be a counterexample to the conjecture. ThisAccording conditionto statesthis that the natural number (or integer)condition, ''n'' is a counterexample if for every prime ''p'', (such that ''p -1'')&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;1 divides &phi;(''n'')implies, ''p''<sup>2</sup> divides ''n''. However Pomerance showed that the existence of such an integer is highly improbable.
 
Another way of stating Carmichael's conjecture is that, if