Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2008/September: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:35, 1 October 2008

Revision as of 00:57, 1 October 2008

Line 47:

New unproposed stub type for an order of monocot plants, complete with its own category (don't you love it when unproposed categories spring up with the WP:WSS notice saying not to create stub types without proposal already in them? Sort of adding insult to injury, or - in this case - perhaps gilding the lily is a better term). Problem with this one is that {{cl|Monocot stubs}} has fewer than 210 unsubcatted stubs, so it's not within a bull's roar of needing a further new split. It also greatly reduces the chances that this type - currently with 25 stubs - will get close to threshold. The template may well be useful in the long run, but it should very likely be upmerged for now. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 11:39, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

*How quickly we forget. See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/August_2007#Plant_taxonomy_stubs|Proposals, August 2007]]. [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] <small><font color="green">[[User talk:Pegship| (tis herself)]]</font></small> 00:29, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

*My count then didn't show viability, either, so I think a category was not necessarily implied by that discussion. If not populable now, upmerge. [[User:Alai|Alai]] ([[User talk:Alai|talk]]) 00:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

==={{tl|Defensive-lineman-1990s-stub}} / {{cl|Defensive lineman, 1990s birth stubs}}===