Wikipedia:Technical terms and definitions: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
BulldozerD11 (talk | contribs)
m Reverted 1 edit by 66.25.154.133 identified as vandalism to last revision by Dank55. (TW)
Line 2:
{{Style}}
 
When writing sextechnical articles, it is usually the case that a number of cocks'''technical terms''' or ''pussy'sjargon'' specific to the subject matter will be presented. These should be defined or at least alternative language provided, so that a non-technical reader can both learn the terms and understand how they are used by scientists. It is also the case that such an article can cover a range of related subjects that might not each justify a separate article or Wikipedia page, and therefore making technical terms stand out in the text is the first level in a sequence from definition to subtitle to separate article. On the other hand, do not treat every “scientific” word as a technical term. Ask the question: Is this the only article or one of a very few where the term might be encountered in Wikipedia? Consider the examples presented below.
 
There are three basic markups used to make technical terms stand out; these are ''italic'' (also termed ''oblique'' with [[sans-serif]] fonts), '''bold''', and '''''bold italic'''''. The following uses of these styles are recommended for technical articles: