Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2008/September: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:43, 3 October 2008

Revision as of 22:55, 11 October 2008

Line 2:

==={{tl|Niue-stub}} / {{cl|Niue stubs}}===

Unproposed, but well-formed. The idea of a template is a perfectly reasonable one; every country should have a generic stub template of its own. The category, however, is never going to come within a bull's roar of threshold - even adding in the six articles marked with {{tl|Niue-geo-stub}} would only bring the total up to nine at the moment. If all the articles in {{cl|Niue}} and its subcats are stubs (highly unlikely) and if there's no double-catting there (which there is), and if every article in there was best suited by a Niue-stub (unlikely, given that articles like [[English language]] are in there) then there'd be 73 stubs - just 13 above threshold. But all that seems highly unlikely. This should almost certainly be upmerged to {{cl|Oceania stubs}}. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

:Given that when you count unique articles there are only 64 I think, this should be upmerged. [[User:Waacstats|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats|talk]]) 22:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

==={{tl|Beijing-Subway-stub}} / {{cl|Beijing Subway stubs}}===