Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terms used in the creation-evolution debate: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Terms used in the creation-evolution debate]]: Delete -- this isn't an article; it's an attempt to circumvent consensus to delete creationist bias. |
|||
Line 8:
* Does not appear to be any of the following: [[WP:NOT|Unsuitable for Wp]], [[WP:NOR|original research]], vanity, advertising, spam, hoax, patent nonsense, vandalism. Therefore, '''keep''' per [[Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#What_to_do_with_a_problem_page.2Fimage.2Fcategory|Wp deletion policy]]. --[[User:Goethean|goethean]] <big>ॐ</big> 22:16, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
**What about "Such a minor branch of a subject that it doesn't deserve an article" or "Article duplicates information in some other article"? -- [[User:Ec5618|Ec5618]] 23:36, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''. Qualifies for deletion as unsuitable for Wikipedia, since it is an attempt to circumvent AfDs that are in the process of being decided by the community against [[User:Ed Poor]]'s wishes. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and attempting to circumvent consensus decisions is abuse of the first water. --[[User:Fubar Obfusco|FOo]] 04:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
| |||