Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tom Sayle: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Tom Sayle: Asking for clarification from Thatcher |
replies |
||
Line 13:
*First off, {{likely}}-->{{confirmed}} that Tom Sayle is a reincarnation of {{user|Andy Bjornovich}}, {{user|Chris Wattson}} and {{user|Mr. Secondattempt}}, both indef blocked for vandalism and harassment. Further new accounts include {{user|Disliker of humanities}}, {{user|Mathematiquizard}}, {{user|Mr. Opensockpuppeter}}. AS far as the range is concerned, there are a handful of other editors besides Tom Sayle, and it is not possible to tie the vandal to any of them with a reasonable degree of certainty. There is a fair amount of IP vandalism from that range as well, so an anon only block would probably cause relatively little inconvenience for good faith users. [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 13:42, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
:{{clerknote}} Interesting that there is no user creation log for [[User:Mr. Secondattempt]]. Part of an ancient sleeper sock drawer? —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:Wknight94|talk]]) 13:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
:::User:Mr. Secondattempt is an SUL account created on wiktionary. [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 18:09, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
::Just to clarify, Thatcher, are you saying that you would, based on the checkuser evidence of the range listed above, support a 79.74.0.0/17 anon-only rangeblock? Just want to be clear that this is a good idea before we do it... --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 17:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
:::If the problem can be dealt with by semi-protecting Half's talk page, that would be the more conservative approach. On the other hand, an anon block on the range will have little collateral damage. [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 18:09, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
| |||