Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Questions: that's about what I figured, but there's no one mistake in context so it remains unclear what he meant |
||
Line 33:
:The third sentence is not parseable. Whatever you were trying to say, the sentence was not properly constructed english and is not understandable. [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 03:37, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
::I think he was trying to say: ''"By the way, if you judge someone's entire life from one mistake, you are close minded and might as well not participate in this discussion at all."'' [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 04:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
:::That was the closest I could come to parsing it as well, but there has been no one mistake in the edit dispute histories and it didn't make sense in local or global context. If that's what he meant, I am not clear what one thing he's referring to. [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 04:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
That is totally not true, Flynn's Taxtonomy, MIMO, SIMO, LIFO, FIFO...etc are all methodologies of processors microarchitecture implementations technologies, the fact that Parallel Computing, Distributed Computing, and Grid Computing utilize those technologies doesn't prove they are parallel computing technologies at all, even though the industry say so. What type of technologies you computational technologies you utilize from other types of sciences is a personal opinion or a corporation opinion of how a product is being built. I think too many people is mixing it up, I just look through some of the talk page and there has been a lot of problems on the talk on LIFO and FIFO.
| |||