Revision as of 15:02, 16 December 2008 edit Agent007bond (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 643 edits →Limitation - Should be obvious: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:07, 16 December 2008 edit undo Anomie (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators 34,835 edits →Limitation - Should be obvious: re Next edit →
Line 85: I understand my suggestion is not fool-proof as more services are starting to require CVV2 code. However, I believe the legitimate services that require CVV2 code will discard the code and destroy all records once the transaction has been made. It protects against fraud during "card present" signature-based transactions, and against friends or significant other who are taking a look at your wallet. --[[User:Agent007bond\|ADTC]] ([[User talk:Agent007bond\|talk]]) 15:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC) : Did you read the first bullet point under [[Card Security Code#CVV2 limitations]]? That addresses the limitation in detail, and has been there since at least 2006. As for your proposal, this is not the place for it. You should contact the credit card companies directly if you want anyone with a chance of changing things to see it. [[User:Anomie\|Anomie]][[User talk:Anomie\|⚔]] 17:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Card security code: Difference between revisions