Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Coolcat, Davenbelle and Stereotek/mentorship: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
David Gerard (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 74:
:::It's a big wide Wikipedia where Cool Cat isn't. I suggest you go in search of it - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 18:05, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
::Eeto, Let me count the reaons why as you put it ''Davenbelle should explain to anyone where he saw these edits'':
::#The arbcom ruling establishing that Davenbelle has had been hounding me. He was asked to stop. So he has a history of stalking which is established to be an unnaceptable behavior by a number of people including [[User:Jimmy Wales]] (regarding an incident which someone was stalking [[User:RickK]])
::#It is imperasive to notice the creation of a page before its even advertised. The only method I know is the monitor of RC feed. It had taken davenbelle less than 10 minutes of the page creation to "coincidentaly" oppose an RfA. Infact his vote was the first one. Not even the nominator had time for his "support" vote. Oh and I declined the RfA because I do not feel it has approporate timing just yet. It appears someone is "stalking" Adam1213, if he accidentaly noticed the page and accidentaly voted oppose then of course stalking is not the case.
::#From my perspective Davenbelle is just choosing a new user to stalk.
::--[[User:Cool Cat|Cool Cat]] [[User talk:Cool Cat|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
|