Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta. |
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 4 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta. |
||
Line 16:
:Looks pretty good! But the colour of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Merseyside/Collaboration]] link suggests to me that you are not using this collaboration of the month thing, so maybe these should be fixed or removed? Ditto for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Merseyside/Merging]]. As you are using so many of the extended quality classes, I might suggest that it would be simpler to use them all and do away with the custom class that you have created. Regards, [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 23:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
::I dunno, I'd prefer to keep things as they are in the current template - they can always be dealt with later. This is still a relatively new WikiProject after all. :) Since everything seems to be in order I'm going to go ahead with the switch. Cheers! [[User:Small-town hero|Small-town hero]] ([[User talk:Small-town hero|talk]]) 01:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
== Another Padding Comment ==
{{WPBannerMeta
|PROJECT = Tulips
|category=no
|BANNER_NAME = Something
|IMAGE_LEFT = Tulip - floriade canberra.jpg
|IMAGE_LEFT_LARGE = 50px
|IMAGE_RIGHT = Tulip - floriade canberra.jpg
|IMAGE_RIGHT_LARGE = 50px
|MAIN_TEXT = <center>'''WPBannerMeta'''</center>This template is within the scope of [[WikiProject Tulips]], a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of [[Tulips]] on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
}}
{{Tmbox
|image = [[Image:Tulip - floriade canberra.jpg|50px]]
|imageright = [[Image:Tulip - floriade canberra.jpg|50px]]
|text = <center>'''Tmbox'''</center>This template is within the scope of [[WikiProject Tulips]], a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of [[Tulips]] on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
}}
{{WPBannerMeta
|PROJECT = Tulips
|category=no
|small=yes
|BANNER_NAME = Something
|IMAGE_LEFT = Tulip - floriade canberra.jpg
|IMAGE_LEFT_SMALL = 30px
|IMAGE_RIGHT = Tulip - floriade canberra.jpg
|IMAGE_RIGHT_SMALL = 30px
|MAIN_TEXT = <center>'''WPBannerMeta'''</center>This template is within the scope of [[WikiProject Tulips]], a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of [[Tulips]] on Wikipedia.
}}
{{Tmbox
|small=yes
|image = [[Image:Tulip - floriade canberra.jpg|30px]]
|imageright = [[Image:Tulip - floriade canberra.jpg|30px]]
|text = <center>'''Tmbox'''</center>This template is within the scope of [[WikiProject Tulips]], a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of [[Tulips]] on Wikipedia.
}}
There's a little bit of a difference with the border on the left when comparing the WPBannerMeta and Tmbox template. Should a bigger left border be added to WPBannerMeta? -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 13:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
:I don't think the border should be bigger necessarily. But perhaps it ought to be the same as the border on the right, which it currently isn't (on my browser anyway). [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 16:16, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
::The main difference is that the quality/importance rows have backgrounds that fill the entire cell; IMO it looks a bit wierd having a huge border between them and the banner border. I agree that the right image should have the same padding as the left image, I'll have a look at that. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 16:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
:::I synchronised the padding left and right. What do people think about it overall? <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 18:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
::::Looks better now that left & right match. Not too bothered about matching with tmbox. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 19:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
== Infobox parameter ==
So far as I can tell, the infobox parameter will always display the following text:
<blockquote>This page has been marked as needing an [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes)|infobox]].</blockquote>
Is it possible to have it use "article" instead of "page" where appropriate (to make it consistant with other uses of article/page/whatever in the banner)? Also, would it be possible to define custom text and even images for this parameter? This could be useful for a WikiProject to link to a specific template or page, for example. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 02:11, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
:It looks like there are two occurences of '''<nowiki>{{ns:0}}</nowiki>''' in WPBannerMeta/core that need changing to '''<nowiki>{{ns:1}}</nowiki>''' to fix the article/page issue. If you want to use more options for the infobox then there is always the option to use the '''note 1''' parameters instead.
<pre>
|note 1 = {{{needs-infobox|}}}
|NOTE_1_TEXT = This {{#switch:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{ns:0}}=article|page}} has been marked as needing an [[Template:Tulip Infobox|infobox]].
|NOTE_1_IMAGE = Nuvola apps arts.png
|NOTE_1_CAT = Tulip articles needing infoboxes.
</pre> -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 10:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
::What if notes 1-5 are already used? Is it possible to specify more? [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 13:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
:::There's a {{para|HOOK_NOTE}} parameter which can be used to add further notes. See example below: -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 13:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
<pre>
{{WPBannerMeta
|PROJECT = Tulips
|small = {{{small|}}}
|category={{{category|¬}}}
|listas = {{{listas|}}}
|note 1 = {{{audio-file|}}}
|NOTE_1_TEXT = An audio file has been created of this article.
|NOTE_1_IMAGE = Nuvola apps arts.png
|NOTE_1_CAT = Tulip articles with audio files
|note 5 = {{{infobox|}}}
|NOTE_5_TEXT = An infobox needs to be added to this article.
|NOTE_5_IMAGE = Diamond-caution.svg
|NOTE_5_CAT = Tulip articles without infoboxes
|HOOK_NOTE={{WPBannerMeta/hooks/notes
|category={{{category|μ}}}
|note 1={{{navbox|}}}
|NOTE_1_TEXT = An navbox needs to be added to this article.
|NOTE_1_IMAGE = Diamond-caution.svg
|NOTE_1_CAT = Tulip articles without navboxes
|note 5={{{otherbox|}}}
|NOTE_5_TEXT = An otherbox needs to be added to this article.
|NOTE_5_IMAGE = Diamond-caution.svg
|NOTE_5_CAT = Tulip articles without otherboxes
}}
}}
</pre>
::::Gotcha. Cheers! [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 17:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
== Another article/page issue ==
Could the WPBannerMeta/importancescale be altered so that "This article has been" is changed to "<nowiki>This {{#if:{{SUBJECTSPACE}}|page|article}} has been</nowiki>", so that it matches WPBannerMeta/qualityscale. Thanks. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 12:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
:{{done}} <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 17:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
== A couple of things... ==
#Could the text for NA quality be changed to "This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the quality scale.", as per other non-article classes and NA importance? This would be useful where NA-Class is used in the article space in lieu of Disambig-Class or Redirect-Class.
#When NA quality is used in the article space, the forced comment message is suppressed. Would it be possible/desirable to suppress the forced message for other non-standard quality grades as well?
Cheers! [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 17:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
:Point 1 has now been fixed I believe. I don't quite understand point 2: what do you mean by "forced comment message"? [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 18:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
::The "please leave comments [[avpoiaev|here]]..." message that appears if no comments exist and {{para|COMMENT_FORCE}} is set. Now disabled for Redirects and Disambigs. Any others? <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 18:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
:::Thanks for that. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 19:11, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
| |||