Revision as of 22:55, 25 October 2005 edit Zephram Stark (talk \| contribs) 1,402 edits →Motion to Grant Equal Editing Rights to All Editors ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:08, 25 October 2005 edit undo Zephram Stark (talk \| contribs) 1,402 edits →Neutral point of view Next edit →
Line 104: :Comment by parties: :# As per [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Zephram_Stark/Evidence#Overview\|my evidence]], neutral content is impossible where administrators are willing to use their power to bias the article unless people like me FuelWagon stand up for the NPOV of the article. We succeeded in neutralizing most of the article on terrorism, despite the extreme efforts of SlimVirgin and Jayjg. The examples section is obviously still POV, however. The opinions expressed are not cited, or even internally consistent with any definition of terrorism. If you want to see exactly what the real issue here is, just try using a non-admin login to introduce a Neutral Point of View in the [[Terrorism#Examples_of_major_incidents\|Examples section of Terrorism]]. --[[User:Zephram Stark\|Zephram Stark]] 23:08, 25 October 2005 (UTC) :# :Comment by others:

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zephram Stark/Workshop: Difference between revisions