Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Differentiating Functions: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:58, 28 October 2005

Revision as of 00:39, 29 October 2005

Line 4:

:The thing is, the article is just a proof that the polynomial power rule works. It doesn't explain anything about calculus. I'm ''fairly'' new to Wikipedia (I was around, but not very active, before I registered), so I'm not sure, but is it Wikipedia habit to put mathematical proof for laymen in articles? If so, I will agree with you. - [[User:ElAmericano|ElAmericano]] 01:52, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

*This afd nomination was [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion|orphaned]]. Listing now. No opinion. —[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] [[User talk:Cryptic|(talk)]] 05:15, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

:**Sorry, I hadn't done an afd/vfd before and thought you just put <nowiki>{{VfD}}</nowiki> at the top of the page and followed the link here. Should I go ahead and fix it, or would that mess things up? - [[User:ElAmericano|ElAmericano]] 15:58, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

***It's already fixed. &mdash;[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] [[User talk:Cryptic|(talk)]] 00:39, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

*'''delete''' unless someone's willing to do some serious cleanup. It has essentially no formatting right now; in my book that's grounds for deletion in itself, in an article that long. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 05:44, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

*'''delete''' inappropriate redunancy. we're not a textbook. the important facts about differentiation can already be found elsewhere. -[[User:Lethe|Lethe]] | [[User talk:Lethe|Talk]] 06:13, 28 October 2005 (UTC)