Wikipedia:Technical terms and definitions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Recategorize |
I changed "rendered as" to "edited by", since "rendered" means the output not the input; I made consistent |
||
Line 7:
There are three basic markups used to make technical terms stand out; these are ''italic'' (also termed ''oblique'' with [[sans-serif]] fonts), '''bold''', and '''''bold italic'''''. The following uses of these styles are recommended for technical articles:
''Italic'' (
*Binomial names of organisms (''Genus species'') are always <i>italicized</i>; the genus name is first-letter capitalized, the species name is not. Higher taxonomic levels are not italicized. When both the classification term and its name form a unified title, they are both first-letter capitalized: "Family Poaceae"; when they do not form a title, only the name is capitalized: "the family Poaceae".
*Foreign language words that are not generally used in English: ''hidari'' (Jp: "left"); but not the word gauche (from Fr: "left"), since this is an established word in English.
Line 15:
*See also: [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]], subsections '''Caption style''' and '''Style for words as words''' and [[Wikipedia:Cite your sources]] for other uses of italicised or oblique text.
'''Bold''' (
*First use of the article name, near the front of the introduction sentence.
*Definitions that are important aspects discussed by the article, but have not been elevated to the level of subtitle and do not pass the "rare technical term" test. Example (from [[Current (electricity)]]):
::In [[electricity]], '''current''' is any flow of [[charge]], usually through a metal wire or some other electrical [[conductor (material)|conductor]]. '''Conventional current''' was defined early in the history of electrical science as a flow of positive charge, although we now know that, in the case of metallic conduction…..
'''''Bold italic''''' (
*First time introduction of a technical term. This should be part of a definition sentence or immediately followed by a non-technical substitute in parentheses. Example (from [[Fern]]):
::A fern is defined as a [[vascular plant]] that reproduces by shedding [[spores]] to initiate an [[alternation of generations]]. New fronds arise by '''''[[Vernation|circinate vernation]]''''' (unrolling leaf formation).
Line 26:
As in the fern example above, any of the three styles described above could be turned into a link if there exists a more detailed or better explanation of the technical term in a separate article. It may not be necessary then to define the term in the article if a link leads to a definition. However, to aid the reader in continuing with the text without having to leave an article for other details, it might still be appropriate to include a non-technical substitute in parentheses, as in the fern example above.
HTML tags <i> and <cite>.
The markup "double-quoted" (edited as <tt>"double-quoted"</tt>) is not risky, but see the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]], subsection '''Punctuation''' for use of quotation marks.
[[Category:Wikipedia help|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|