Revision as of 08:09, 14 March 2009 edit Sssoul (talk \| contribs) 6,886 edits →Points removed from year markup disadvantages: cmt ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:36, 14 March 2009 edit undo Tony1 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors 279,133 edits →Points removed from year markup disadvantages Next edit →
Line 94: :right: every bit of markup complicates editing - but this RfC is not about those other types of markup. the question of whether date-linking/markup is worth the added complication is important to some of us. please discuss the wording instead of deleting the point, okay? thanks [[User:Sssoul\|Sssoul]] ([[User talk:Sssoul\|talk]]) 08:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC) ::Indeed, Sssoul has said it well. [[User:Tony1\|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1\|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 08:36, 14 March 2009 (UTC) == Clerk ==

Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll/Archive 1: Difference between revisions