Content deleted Content added
added section for old topic |
|||
Line 5:
:Are you sure that coupling is used more than the dependency? Also I am not so sure what you mean by specialists. By that, do you mean computer scientists? computer programmers? hackers? -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 20:10, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
:: by specialists I mean computer scientists and programmers, I have always heard about the couple coupling/cohesion as dual concepts et not dependency/cohesion. I think that there are in facts two different concepts in this entry, '''dependency''' which is in fact, rather related to RPM and packages, and '''coupling''' which is used in Object Oriented design, the two concepts are from two diffrents cultures, Linux hackers for the first and programmers using Object oriented languages for the second.--[[User:Khalid hassani|Khalid hassani]] 21:48, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
:I would also rename this entry to '''Coupling (Computer science)'''. In the article itself, the term "Coupling" occurs 28 times, whereas "Dependency" occurs only 6 times (not counting the name of the article). And [[Coupling#Computer programming]] points to here. I'm going to do the rename (maybe in about 8 or 10 hours). — [[User:Adrian Buehlmann|Adrian]] | [[User talk:Adrian Buehlmann|Talk]] 23:50, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
== gains in the software development process ==
| |||