Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Autoformatting responses: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
David Fuchs (talk | contribs) |
Hans Adler (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19:
#'''Oppose''': What problem are we trying to solve by this? <small>[[User:Seicer|<font color="#CC0000">seicer</font>]] | [[User_talk:Seicer|<font color="#669900">talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Seicer|<font color="#669900">contribs</font>]]</small> 23:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
#As a featured contributor, I have found no reason for it. --<font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltempierte Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 23:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
#Oppose. The "pro" arguments are not convincing at all, but the "contra" arguments describe very real problems. All the disadvantages just to give a few people the option to display an article with US spelling in UK date format or vice versa? This is obvious feature bloat. --[[User:Hans Adler|Hans Adler]] ([[User talk:Hans Adler|talk]]) 00:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
=====I am neutral on the general concept of autoformatting=====
| |||