Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2009/March: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 198:
::::Alright then, so what do we do? Do we just wait for someone to raise a complaint? By the way, I couldn't find the discussions you referred to. Could you send me direct links to their sections?--[[Special:Contributions/189.121.183.72|189.121.183.72]] ([[User talk:189.121.183.72|talk]]) 21:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::Best thing to do is probably see whether any other WP:WSS regular has anything to say about the matter. I'm not as active here as I used to be, and things may well have changed enough that stub-sorters are more lenient on this sort of type now. As for links, there are many - {http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2008/August/28 South ossetia], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2007/January/8#.7B.7BAbkhazia-stub.7D.7D_.2F_Cat:Abkhazia_stubs Abkhazia], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/May_2007#Cat:Chechen_people_stubs Chechnya], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2007/August/6 North Cyprus here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2006/September/29 here]... The most complicated series of problems was probably that with the Kosovo stub types (some of the links can be found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target=Template%3AKosovo-geo-stub&namespace=4 here]). [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 21:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Continuing,
| |||