Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Signing comment by 98.221.87.128 - "" |
||
Line 198:
The article does a poor job in failing to point out it is heavily biased towards [[worst-case analysis]]/[[worst-case complexity]] (and there are no articles explaining this concept). I threw in a phrase into the overview section, but someone has to make a prominent point on the issue in the article, since this is a fundamental concept. Probably a whole section about worst/case/average caes, upper/lower bounds, etc. Unfortunately I am not a man for the job. [[User:Twri|Twri]] ([[User talk:Twri|talk]]) 19:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Also, the neutrality of this part of the article is disputable. Perhaps a revision is needed? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.221.87.128|98.221.87.128]] ([[User talk:98.221.87.128|talk]]) 21:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== OK done big edit ==
| |||