Content deleted Content added
→Proposal for layout of article: string theory clarification |
|||
Line 1,489:
::Re "My point wasn't to attack you.." Perhaps I would not have misunderstood your point so completely had not four out of five sentences in that paragraph had "you" as the subject: "You are... To you... you should...You are..." sounds a lot like you are talking about ''me'' not the article. The fifth sentence (second in your paragraph) was about the layout, but purportedly my "view" so it was still aimed at me. Perhaps if you had said "the article" "this citation" "this paragraph" I would have understood you were talking about the article. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]] 16:43, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Just one more note on string theory, while there currently is no single experiment that can prove string theory... there are a number of experiments that would support it. One is the new Cern [[Large_Hadron_Collider|particle collider]]; if it verifiably produced mini-black holes, it would validate a prediction by string theorists. I have also heard of experiments on gravity waves and detecting gravitons leaking to/from other dimensions. Ultimately if the experiments mentioned above turn up nothing and/or unexpected results; that will have a significant impact on string theory. - [[User:RoyBoy|Roy]][[User talk:RoyBoy|'''Boy''']] <sup>[[User:RoyBoy/The 800 Club|800]]</sup> 16:27, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
== Discussion: A plea ==
| |||