Revision as of 16:15, 11 April 2009 edit Mzajac (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 66,545 edits →I support Option #1 (link only relevant dates): like any other term ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:17, 11 April 2009 edit undo Mzajac (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 66,545 edits m →I support Option #1 (link only relevant dates): like any other term, and subject to editors' judgment Next edit →
Line 243: #'''Support''', linking to a date usually adds nothing to an article. <small>[[User:Udonknome\|<font color="green">'''Do U(knome)?'''</font>]]</small> <sup>[[Special:Random\|<font color="red">yes...</font>]]</sup><sub>[[User talk:Udonknome\|<font color="blue">or no</font>]]</sub> 01:23, 11 April 2009 (UTC) #'''Support'''. Linking of dates other than according to this principle is just annoying visual noise. Removing guidance altogether is a recipe for future conflict. The best option is a simple guideline like this one. [[User:McKay\|McKay]] ([[User talk:McKay\|talk]]) 02:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC) # '''Support'''  Like any other term, a date should be linked only when appropriate, according to the editors' judgment. ''—[[User:Mzajac \|Michael]] [[User talk:Mzajac \|Z.]] <small>2009-04-11 16:15 z</small>'' =====I support Option #2 (commemorative links only)=====

Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Month-day responses: Difference between revisions