Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Month-day responses: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:09, 11 April 2009

Revision as of 18:25, 11 April 2009

Line 245:

# '''Support'''&nbsp; Like any other term, a date should be linked only when appropriate, according to the editors' judgment.&nbsp;''—[[User:Mzajac |Michael]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mzajac |Z.]]&nbsp;<small>2009-04-11&nbsp;16:15&nbsp;z</small>''

#'''Support''' I think that this is the best option as long as "relevant" is defined liberally. I think that too many links is better than too few. [[User:Captain panda|<font color="orange" face="comic sans ms">Captain</font>]] [[User talk:Captain panda|<font color="red" face="Papyrus">panda</font>]] 17:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

# Although I'd prefer option #3, this seems like an adequate compromise. [[User:Titoxd|Tito<span style="color:#008000;">xd</span>]]^{([[User talk:Titoxd|?!?]] - [[WP:FAC|cool stuff]])} 18:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

=====I support Option #2 (commemorative links only)=====