Revision as of 18:01, 12 April 2009 view source Thelostlibertine (talk \| contribs) 244 edits →I support the general concept of autoformatting ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:21, 12 April 2009 view source Reconsideration (talk \| contribs) 12,308 edits →I oppose the general concept of autoformatting: oppose Next edit →
Line 525: # '''Oppose''' per above arguments. [[User:NSR77\|<font color="#000000">'''NSR'''</font><font color="#26466D ">'''77'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:NSR77\|<font color="#000000">T</font>]]</sup> 15:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC) # '''Oppose''' What need is there for such a feature? This is not a rhetorical question; the answer is none. Unnecessary and trivial – basically per above. [[User:Andre666\|Andre666]] ([[User talk:Andre666\|talk]]) 17:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC) # '''Oppose''' as per Scheinwerfermann (#233) and Waltham (#244). Also, the value of helping persnickety WP editors to see dates always in the format they're used to seeing them in does not outweigh the bother involved. No one is confused by dates, and editors need to be tolerant about style. [[User:Reconsideration\|Reconsideration]] ([[User talk:Reconsideration\|talk]]) 18:20, 12 April 2009 (UTC) =====I am neutral on the general concept of autoformatting=====

Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Autoformatting responses: Difference between revisions