Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pbit sort: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:42, 16 November 2005

Revision as of 19:13, 9 February 2010

Line 6:

The result of the debate was '''delete'''. '''[[User:Jaxl|<font color = "darkblue">Rob</font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color = "green">e</font>]][[User:Jaxl|<font color = "darkblue">rt</font>]]''' ^{[[User talk:Jaxl|<font color = "darkred"><small>'''T'''</small></font>]] | [[Special:Emailuser/Jaxl|<font color = "green"><small>'''@'''</small></font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jaxl|<font color = "orange"><small>'''C'''</small></font>]]} 01:42, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

===[[Pbit sort]]===

This article appears to be original research. Google can't find any references except the same paper linked in this article. [[User:P3d0Doradus|P3d0Doradus]] 23:49, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' per nom. I can't even find a definition of "pbit" that fits the context. - [[User:Dalbury|Dalbury]] [[User_talk:Dalbury|(talk)]] 01:32, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' as per nomination. The paper doesn't look like something that has gotten through peer review, it looks more like the first version which you go over once more before submitting it for consideration. My first hunch is that someone has rediscovered [[radix sort]], but I haven't checked the algorithm well enough to be sure that I'm not 100% off the mark. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 08:31, 11 November 2005 (UTC)