Revision as of 16:03, 21 April 2009 edit Sssoul (talk \| contribs) 6,886 edits →Turning date linking off in one fell swoop: see above ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:58, 22 April 2009 edit undo Dmadeo (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 22,084 edits →Turning date linking off in one fell swoop Next edit →
Line 604: :As you say, this could be a decent first step. It definitely wouldn't be appropriate as the only solution, as many of us opposed because we don't like the increased complexity for editing. It also assumes that autoformatting will continue, and I don't think there is consensus for that. [[User:Karanacs\|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs\|talk]]) 15:57, 21 April 2009 (UTC) ::... there are two long sections above ("action plan" and "bug filed") discussing that very idea, its repercussions, why it's not that simple, etc. [[User:Sssoul\|Sssoul]] ([[User talk:Sssoul\|talk]]) 16:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC) ::: I believe we're talking about two different things Ssoul. Above is discussion about the Dynamic Dates config line which would disable autoformatting entirely. I'm referring to a patch which would not touch autoformatting per se (which is what all the complication above appears to be about) but merely modify it to not link dates. [[User:Dmadeo\|dm]] ([[User talk:Dmadeo\|talk]]) 02:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll: Difference between revisions