Revision as of 04:47, 22 April 2009 edit Sssoul (talk \| contribs) 6,886 edits →Turning date linking off in one fell swoop: oh sorry ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:50, 22 April 2009 edit undo Sssoul (talk \| contribs) 6,886 edits m →Turning date linking off in one fell swoop: pass the caffeine Next edit →
Line 607: ::: I believe we're talking about two different things Ssoul. Above is discussion about the Dynamic Dates config line which would disable autoformatting entirely. I'm referring to a patch which would not touch autoformatting per se (which is what all the complication above appears to be about) but merely modify it to not link dates. [[User:Dmadeo\|dm]] ([[User talk:Dmadeo\|talk]]) 02:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC) (outdent) ah - sorry! you mean the patch that uses linking markup for dates but instead of linking them it autoformats them, apart from serious problems handling punctuation and date ranges? that was thoroughly discussed while the last RfC was being constructed, and even the pro-DA people decided it was not a good idea to propose that route to the community. someone else can i'm sure direct you to that discussion. ~~but since the RfC itself shows (again) that the community doesn't want autoformatting, it's extremely difficult to see any reason to keep talking about preserving it.~~ [[User:Sssoul\|Sssoul]] ([[User talk:Sssoul\|talk]]) 04:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll: Difference between revisions