Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ohconfucius (talk | contribs) archived |
|||
Line 246:
::::And just to reinterate, it is inconceivable that Google would use the old square-bracket system to locate dates. It is blindingly easy to automatically locate dates in WP's text without them. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 04:34, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::Completely agree.-[[User:J JMesserly|J JMesserly]] ([[User talk:J JMesserly|talk]]) 04:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
==What does this solve?==
Does this result actually solve anything or make edit warring any less likely? surely we will now get into arguments over what 'germane to the subject' actually means in practice. It could be argued that year links are in some cases by definition germane to the subject if they add historical context to a subject of international politics say. [[User:G-Man|<font color="blue">G-Man</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:G-Man|<font color="#00BFFF">?</font>]]</sup> 23:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
== "Dates" case and temporary injunction: likely timing? ==
| |||