Talk:Eiffel (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:04, 19 November 2005

Revision as of 16:21, 12 December 2005

Line 61:

This style is recurrant in the article, and, though from good intentions, is more reminescent of sales talk than encyclopaedic treatment or dispassionate analysis. Hope this helps!<br>

[[User:Mikademus|Mikademus]] 21:04, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

I think the sentence fragment that reads "which emphasizes the production of robust software" is questionable. It would be better (more accurate/NPV) to change this to something along the lines of "emphasises the production of software which is correct to formal specifification". Esp. given the Eiffel tendency to fail hard on contract breaches; which has a tendency to work against robustness.