Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Zelda Project: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Wikipedian06 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Marasmusine (talk | contribs) →Untitled Zelda Project: delete |
||
Line 25:
* '''Comment''' Ive had this discussion under the exact same circumstances regarding [[Dragon Quest X]] initially i felt a merge into the main series article was appropriate but concensus pointed out to me that the article would be re created anyway if it were deleted shortly. The main fact of not deleting this article is that the game is confirmed and even though no additional details exist beyond that it 'exists' is seemingly enough for the internet to establish its notability. Secondary sources pick these up like crazy establishing notability basically because the topic is sought out information and popular. Which is why the page is likely to be re created anyway if it were to be deleted. Additionally Movies that are not in principal photography ([[WP:NFF]]) generally warrent deletion based on simplified wiki guidlines, however; a more popular movie will again establish notability with secondary sources. I think unless this movie guidline spreads to video games as well theres no justification to delete the article. If I am missing anything crucial here like a policy im unaware of please inform me, thanks [[User:Ottawa4ever|Ottawa4ever]] ([[User talk:Ottawa4ever|talk]]) 01:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
* Merge into Zelda (series) until there is a title and a release date/window. [[User:Wikipedian06|Wikipedian06]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian06|talk]]) 08:18, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - one can't build an article on press releases and speculation. [[User:Marasmusine|Marasmusine]] ([[User talk:Marasmusine|talk]]) 09:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
| |||