Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 125.238.96.209 - "→C++ generators: " |
Dblanchard (talk | contribs) m Seeking help understanding the Python prime number generator code. |
||
Line 202:
: I would say no. The content should be judged on it's own merits regardless of any activity involving the user who initially contributed it. I've reviewed the code and see nothing wrong with it, and in fact believe it to be an great example for demonstrating Python generators (in terms of ease of understanding, not necessarily efficiency). My only hesitation would be the policy of [[WP:BAN]], in that if these edits were made ''while'' the user was banned, then perhaps they ''could'' be reverted. But the policy doesn't say such edits ''have'' to be reverted, only that they may be. So I believe the content in this case is good enough to keep. [[User:Dmeranda|Dmeranda]] 16:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
: I agree, the quality of the content overrules the character of the contributor. However, the Python example's prime number generator is beyond me. In particular, the line "if not any( n % f == 0 for f in p ):" uses the variable "f" which is never created in the code. Any help?
[[User:Dblanchard|dblanchard]] ([[User talk:Dblanchard|talk]])
==Fuzzy definition?==
| |||