Modal analysis using FEM: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 36:
This is the general form of the eigensystem encountered in structural
engineering using the [[FEM]]. Further, harmonic motion is typically assumed for the
structure so that <math> [\ddot U] </math>
is taken to equal <math> \lambda [U] </math>,
where <math> \lambda </math> is an eigenvalue (with units of reciprocal time squared, e.g., <math>\mathrm{s}^{-2}</math>),
and the equation reduces to:<ref> Clough, Ray W. and Joseph Penzien, ''Dynamics of Structures'', 2nd Ed.,
McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, 1993, page 201 </ref>
 
:<math>[M][U] \lambda + [K][U] = [0]</math>
:<math>
[M] [U] \lambda +
[K] [U] =
[0]
</math>
 
In contrast, the equation for static problems is:
 
:<math> [K][U] = [F] </math>
[K] [U] =
[F]
</math>
 
which is expected when all terms having a time derivative are set to zero.
Line 62 ⟶ 55:
expressed as:
 
:<math>[A][x] = [x]\lambda</math>
[A] [x] =
[x] { \lambda }
</math>
 
Both equations can be seen as the same because if the general equation is
Line 72 ⟶ 62:
it will take the form of the latter.<ref> Thomson, William T., '' Theory of Vibration with
Applications'', 3rd Ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 1988, page 165 </ref>
It should be noted that because only the lower modes are desired, solving the system
more likely involves the equivalent of multiplying through by the inverse of the stiffness,
<math> [K]^{-1} </math>, a process called [[inverse iteration]].<ref> Hughes, Thomas J. R., ''The Finite Element Method'', Prentice-Hall Inc.,