Module talk:WikiProject banner/Archive 7: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:29, 11 August 2009

Revision as of 08:37, 13 August 2009

Line 76:

:::That was an issue in [[Template:WPBannerMeta/templatepage/preloadmeta]]. Now {{fixed}} &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 08:28, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

::Thanks for fixing it! --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 19:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

== Customized comments ==

Hey, can someone help me with [[Template:WikiProject Lithuania]]? There used to be a customized comment section, which does not go onto subpage, but directly into template. It was mostly used for signatures of reviewer. I cannot figure out how to make it work with the meta banner. Help? [[User:Renata3|Renata]] ([[User talk:Renata3|talk]])

:I've added a note on the banner for it (example on [[Template:WikiProject Lithuania/testcases|/testcases]]). However you also have the subpage feature enabled - do you need this as well? .... &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 07:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

::Great! Thank you. No, the subpage feature was not needed -- I deleted it. [[User:Renata3|Renata]] ([[User talk:Renata3|talk]]) 00:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

== Suggestions for A-Class and Peer Review hooks ==

A few minor suggestions to make these two hooks more visually consistant...

* At [[Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/aclass]], change:

<pre>

|TEXT = This article '''[[{{{SUBPAGE_LINK}}}|is undergoing]]''' an [[{{{REVIEW_LINK}}}|A-Class review]].

...

|TEXT = This article '''[[{{{SUBPAGE_LINK}}}|{{#switch:{{lc:{{{a class|}}}}}|pass=has passed|fail=has failed|current=is undergoing}}]]''' an [[{{{REVIEW_LINK|}}}|A-Class review]].

</pre>

to:

<pre>

|TEXT = This article '''[[{{{SUBPAGE_LINK}}}|is currently undergoing]]''' an [[{{{REVIEW_LINK}}}|A-Class review]].

...

|TEXT = This article '''[[{{{SUBPAGE_LINK}}}|{{#switch:{{lc:{{{a class|}}}}}|pass=has passed|fail=has failed|current=is currently undergoing}}]]''' an [[{{{REVIEW_LINK|}}}|A-Class review]].

</pre>

This one is just an idea, but why not use the different icons for current/pass/fail, e.g.

<pre>

|IMAGE = {{#if:{{{IMAGE|}}}|{{{IMAGE}}}|{{#switch:{{lc:{{{a class|}}}}}|pass=Symbol a class|fail=Symbol unsupport A vote|current=A candidate}}.svg}}

</pre>

* At [[Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/peerreview]], change:

<pre>

|TEXT = This {{#if:{{SUBJECTSPACE}}|page|article}} is [[{{{LINK}}}/{{SUBJECTPAGENAME}}|currently]] being [[{{{LINK|}}}|peer reviewed]].

...

|TEXT = This {{#if:{{SUBJECTSPACE}}|page|article}} has had a [[{{{LINK}}}|peer review]] which is now [[{{{LINK}}}/{{SUBJECTPAGENAME}}|archived]].

...

|TEXT = This {{#ifeq:{{{class|}}}|NA|page|article}} is [[{{{LINK}}}/{{SUBJECTPAGENAME:{{#if:{{{title|}}}|{{{title}}}|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}}|currently]] being [[{{{LINK|}}}|peer reviewed]].

...

|TEXT = This {{#ifeq:{{{class|}}}|NA|page|article}} has had a [[{{{LINK}}}|peer review]] which is now [[{{{LINK}}}/{{SUBJECTPAGENAME:{{#if:{{{title|}}}|{{{title}}}|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}}|archived]].

</pre>

to:

<pre>

|TEXT = This {{#if:{{SUBJECTSPACE}}|page|article}} '''[[{{{LINK}}}/{{SUBJECTPAGENAME}}|is currently undergoing]]''' a [[{{{LINK|}}}|peer review]].

...

|TEXT = This {{#if:{{SUBJECTSPACE}}|page|article}} has had a [[{{{LINK}}}|peer review]] which is '''[[{{{LINK}}}/{{SUBJECTPAGENAME}}|now archived]]'''.

...

|TEXT = This {{#ifeq:{{{class|}}}|NA|page|article}} '''[[{{{LINK}}}/{{SUBJECTPAGENAME:{{#if:{{{title|}}}|{{{title}}}|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}}|is currently undergoing]]''' a [[{{{LINK|}}}|peer review]].

...

|TEXT = This {{#ifeq:{{{class|}}}|NA|page|article}} has had a [[{{{LINK}}}|peer review]] which is '''[[{{{LINK}}}/{{SUBJECTPAGENAME:{{#if:{{{title|}}}|{{{title}}}|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}}|now archived]]'''.

</pre>

Also (I've mentioned this elsewhere) add a {{para|SIZE}} parameter as per the A-Class hook by changing all instances of:

<pre>

|SIZE = 30px

</pre>

to:

<pre>

|SIZE = {{#if:{{{SIZE|}}}|{{{SIZE}}}|30px}}

</pre>

Thoughts? [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 23:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

:The <tt><nowiki>{{#ifeq:{{{class|}}}|NA|page|article}}</nowiki></tt> part of the peerreview template should be changed to <tt><nowiki>{{pagetype}}</nowiki></tt> as class isn't even a parameter in the peerreview template. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 06:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

{{done}} I like all of these suggestions. [[User:Happy-melon|<span style="color:forestgreen">'''Happy'''</span>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<span style="color:darkorange">'''melon'''</span>]] 11:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

:Thanks! Not sure if it was intentional or not, but you missed the bold text in the peer review hook... ;) [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 21:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

::It was accidental, but I'm not sure which I prefer. {{tlx|ChicagoWikiProject}} has both in play; what do people think? [[User:Happy-melon|<span style="color:forestgreen">'''Happy'''</span>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<span style="color:darkorange">'''melon'''</span>]] 21:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

:::I don't mind terribly whether you opt for bolded or unbolded text, I just think it should be consistant across the two hooks. But personally I would say the bold because it highlights the most relevant link. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 22:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC)