Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta. |
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta. |
||
Line 96:
Please see the sandbox for the above template, the TFs are redirects to the WPs, and there were no nested parameters, so I've added that to the sandbox version. Please update the code for us. Thanks --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 21:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
== Task force naming and categorization ==
I'm trying to convert [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Los Angeles|WikiProject LA]] into one of the task forces of [[:Category:WikiProject California articles]] and have a minor issue with the category naming on the [[:Category:WikiProject Los Angeles articles by quality]]. The articles all have the WikiProject prefix in front of them and wanted to drop that on the rename. Can somebody take a look at my last edit to [[Template:WikiProject California/sandbox]] and make sure that it will rename [[:Category:B-Class WikiProject Los Angeles articles]] → [[:Category:B-Class Los Angeles articles]], etc. Also does anyone know any adjustments will be needed for [[User:WP 1.0 bot]] to get the statistics correctly. -[[User:Optigan13|Optigan13]] ([[User talk:Optigan13|talk]]) 05:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
:Yes, that looks fine. As long as you put them in [[:Category:Wikipedia 1.0 assessments]] the bot should find them. You might like to use [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:WikiProject_California/sandbox&oldid=304833257 this version] which prompts you for the categories which need creating. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 07:14, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
::Thanks, I think I've pulled it off, but can you double check my work at both the [[Template:WikiProject California|template]] and at the task forces of [[:Category:WikiProject California]]. I want to make sure before I fire off a bot request to replace the templates. The 1.0 assessment fired correctly for Los Angeles. As long as Foo by quality and Foo by importance have the WP 1.0 category that it will work, right? -[[User:Optigan13|Optigan13]] ([[User talk:Optigan13|talk]]) 02:28, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
:::Everything looks fine to me. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 10:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
== Comments page TOC issue ==
This problem was brought up at [[Template_talk:WPAVIATION#Comment_subpage]] and can be viewed at [[Talk:UH-1_Iroquois]]. If the comment page included a header, the whole talk page toc is also embedded into the banner. Can this be fixed? - '''[[User:Trevor MacInnis|<span style="font-family:Century Gothic;color:SteelBlue">Trevor</span>]] [[User talk:Trevor MacInnis|<span style="font-family:Century Gothic;color:IndianRed">MacInnis</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Trevor MacInnis|<span style="font-family:Century Gothic;color:DarkOliveGreen"><sup>contribs</sup></span>]]''' 02:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
:Not in the banner code as far as I'm aware. The way to fix it is to add <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki> below all the banners on the affected talk pages. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 06:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
|