Content deleted Content added
Line 112:
Technically the Haskell definition is the equation that defines ''any'' fixed point combinator no? So why is it Y? [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 04:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
: Well, that was incorrect, so I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fixed_point_combinator&diff=309319192&oldid=309312639 fixed it]. [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 21:33, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
== "Fixed point combinators allow the definition of anonymous recursive functions" ==
|