Core-based trees: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:21, 14 December 2005

Revision as of 11:53, 14 December 2005

Line 6:

An extract from the only book i know of published on this subject is quite striking when you think about it for any amount of time.

'...And the tendency for the virus to be rejected and destroyed by the host tree stem is disparingly low...'.

This obviously indicates that core based trees are in fact a useless technique and only employed by the most desperate of technicians.

A chracterisic of core based trees that have been infected by a virus is that "their leaves turn brown and tend to fall off". This is the term in the ICT world which means the system files are slowly corrupt untill the OS (Operating system) is unuableunusable.

Line 18:

R=Span of tree network

I=Number of affected '''folders''' not files, common misconception

s=density of virus

Line 31 ⟶ 33:

A is the tendecy of rejection so,

(√RI)-(U+2as)=aA

theThe higher value of aA, the less chance of rejections.

== How to fix it? ==

This section will deal with how to fix your computer if it has been afflicted by a virus that cbt's dont affect, this usually involves getting a proffesional to deal with your desktop or laptop which does tend to cost some amount, but there are some methods of dealing with these that don't require money to change hands at all; these include system restores and bespoke software and end with crudely using magnets and hammers.