Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Jpgordon: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 51:
Do you support the creation of a [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Code of Conduct]] as I have just now suggested at [[User talk:Jimbo Wales#A sincere question]]? - [[User:Ted Wilkes|Ted Wilkes]] 18:36, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
*Sure. Fred's revision is pretty good and workable. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]][[User talk:Jpgordon|∇∆∇∆]] 16:13, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
==Questions from [[User:-Ril-|-Ril-]]==
''Do you hold any strong political or religious opinions (e.g. concerning George Bush, Islam, or on which end you should break a boiled egg)? If so, would you recuse yourself from cases centred on these?''
''How willing are you to contest the decisions of other arbitrators rather than just "go with the flow"?''
''Do you view all requests to re-address cases, particularly requests made by those most penalised, as being automatically without merit?''
''In the case against Yuber, it was decided by the arbitration committee that it is the duty of arbitrators to investigate, and rule on the behaviour of not only one party involved, but all of them. Do you support this decision? [if current arbitrator] Does your visible behaviour on recent cases reflect this decision?''
--[[User:-Ril-|Victim of signature fascism]] 16:00, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||