Content deleted Content added
→Suggestions re Wind power and SR Merchant Navy Class: Thanks, much better but... |
|||
Line 115:
*[[User:Tony1/Advanced_editing_exercises#Wind power|Wind power]]
*[[User:Tony1/Advanced_editing_exercises#Wind power|SR Merchant Navy Class (2)]] [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 11:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
::Thanks Tony.
::'''SR Merchant Navy Class (2)''': Yep, perfect, I think this is much safer.
::'''[[User:Tony1/Advanced_editing_exercises#Wind power|Wind power]]''': At the moment there are two solutions that are identical – I guess you meant to remove the second. It still sounds a little odd to me: I'd have thought three blades '''''is''''' a design, not three blades '''''are''''' a design. But of course "three blades" has to be treated as plural in the first part. I'm no grammar expert so I'll defer to your judgment here. One more alternative: ''The most common design for modern windmills is a three-blade turbine, which minimises forces related to material fatigue.'' [[User:Adrian J. Hunter|Adrian '''J.''' Hunter]]<sup>([[User talk:Adrian J. Hunter|talk]]•[[Special:contributions/Adrian J. Hunter|contribs]])</sup> 12:02, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
|