Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Jpgordon: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:07, 18 December 2005

Revision as of 23:21, 18 December 2005

Line 79:

Thanks for your time

[[User:Justforasecond|Justforasecond]] 23:07, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

*It wasn't that you filed an RfAr. Your obsession with persecuting another user -- quite effectively and successfully, as we've seen -- is damaging to the polity of Wikipedia. If I am chosen to become an arbitrator, I will certainly recuse myself from any action involving you (and, for that matter, any action involving [[User:Deeceevoice|Deeceevoice]], should we be lucky enough for her to return after the damage you've caused settles down.) Until then, I'm a plain ordinary user-janitor disgusted with your behavior and angered by the result, and as a result I made an intemperate posting, for which I was properly briefly blocked (as befitting a first offense). The appropriate action when an RfC fails and is withdrawn is to consider whether the RfC was appropriate in the first place. [[WP:DICK]] is a very important principle here. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]][[User talk:Jpgordon|∇∆∇∆]] 23:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)